mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014332.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "28",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 28 of 95 2766 LCI1MAX1 travel, so that there has to be a causation, some effect of the persuasion. MR. ROHRBACH: Well, the instructions say that there has to be persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel, and the individual has to actually travel. Those concepts are all already captured in the instruction. These instructions for this element are just -- or this offense are quite standard that are in the Court's jury charge. THE COURT: Yeah, I think that's right. It seems to me -- well, one, it's a standard charge for this provision; two, it's accurate; three, adding -- I mean, it seems to me that the basic suggestion applies additional causation beyond what's required by the ordinary meaning, and I don't see a basis for that. So I will overrule the request. What's next? MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor? THE COURT: Yes. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, next request is at page 23. THE COURT: Okay. MR. EVERDELL: This is at line 15 through 22, which is the instruction on significant or motivating purpose -- THE COURT: Yes. MR. EVERDELL: -- which was a suggestion from the defense, and we appreciate the Court's inclusion. THE COURT: Well, I think you'd suggested significant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014332",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 28 of 95 2766 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "travel, so that there has to be a causation, some effect of the persuasion. MR. ROHRBACH: Well, the instructions say that there has to be persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel, and the individual has to actually travel. Those concepts are all already captured in the instruction. These instructions for this element are just -- or this offense are quite standard that are in the Court's jury charge. THE COURT: Yeah, I think that's right. It seems to me -- well, one, it's a standard charge for this provision; two, it's accurate; three, adding -- I mean, it seems to me that the basic suggestion applies additional causation beyond what's required by the ordinary meaning, and I don't see a basis for that. So I will overrule the request. What's next? MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor? THE COURT: Yes. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, next request is at page 23. THE COURT: Okay. MR. EVERDELL: This is at line 15 through 22, which is the instruction on significant or motivating purpose -- THE COURT: Yes. MR. EVERDELL: -- which was a suggestion from the defense, and we appreciate the Court's inclusion. THE COURT: Well, I think you'd suggested significant",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014332",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014332"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}