mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014333.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "29",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 29 of 95 2767 LCI1MAX1\nand, if I'm remembering correctly --\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. That may be true.\nTHE COURT: Yes. Go ahead.\nMR. EVERDELL: So we have found a different instruction on this point which we would ask the Court to consider, and it comes from United States v. Miller, and I can hand that up to the Court and the government.\nTHE COURT: Just to be clear, I adopted your suggestion and now you're asking me to do something different.\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, it is true, your Honor, and I will keep what I have, if this is objectionable to the Court.\nBut we only found this one as we were looking through with respect to the charge.\nTHE COURT: It happens. Just give me a moment to get to my notes on this one.\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I can give a typewritten proposed instruction.\nPage 211 of the opinion is the instruction that was given by Judge Rakoff.\nTHE COURT: And what's the charge in the Miller case?\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, Miller was found guilty of 2422 and 2423, the same statutes we're talking about.\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the proposal is, in order to establish the element, the government must prove that it was part of Ms. Maxwell's conscious purpose in having Jane travel\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014333",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 29 of 95 2767 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "and, if I'm remembering correctly --\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. That may be true.\nTHE COURT: Yes. Go ahead.\nMR. EVERDELL: So we have found a different instruction on this point which we would ask the Court to consider, and it comes from United States v. Miller, and I can hand that up to the Court and the government.\nTHE COURT: Just to be clear, I adopted your suggestion and now you're asking me to do something different.\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, it is true, your Honor, and I will keep what I have, if this is objectionable to the Court.\nBut we only found this one as we were looking through with respect to the charge.\nTHE COURT: It happens. Just give me a moment to get to my notes on this one.\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I can give a typewritten proposed instruction.\nPage 211 of the opinion is the instruction that was given by Judge Rakoff.\nTHE COURT: And what's the charge in the Miller case?\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, Miller was found guilty of 2422 and 2423, the same statutes we're talking about.\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the proposal is, in order to establish the element, the government must prove that it was part of Ms. Maxwell's conscious purpose in having Jane travel",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014333",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Judge Rakoff",
      "Miller",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "2422",
      "2423",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014333"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}