mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014340.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "36",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 36 of 95 2774 LCI1MAX1\n1 can hand it up.\n2 THE COURT: Sure.\n3 MR. EVERDELL: And your Honor, as you consider that,\n4 there is one proposed addition I just want to request to what's\n5 on that page, but I want to handle that slightly separately.\n6 THE COURT: The representation is these are --\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Yeah.\n8 THE COURT: -- my limiting instructions given before\n9 Kate and Ms. Farmer testified, and you're asking for\n10 inclusion -- repetition of those limiting instructions where\n11 the violation of New York criminal law is provided.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: That's correct, your Honor. And we\n13 would propose just putting it at the end after the discussion\n14 that's already there.\n15 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach.\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: I think that among other things, your\n17 Honor, I think that would be -- the instruction as you've\n18 crafted it is a correct statement of New York law and the\n19 relevant issues. Adding these instructions would be quite\n20 confusing to the jury. The jury has already heard them. This\n21 is the place where there's no reason to give the Kate\n22 instruction because these jury instructions state specifically\n23 that the jury may not convict based solely on overt acts that\n24 relate to Kate, and so there is no risk, when these full set of\n25 instructions is read to the jury, that they will think that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014340",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 36 of 95 2774 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 can hand it up.\n2 THE COURT: Sure.\n3 MR. EVERDELL: And your Honor, as you consider that,\n4 there is one proposed addition I just want to request to what's\n5 on that page, but I want to handle that slightly separately.\n6 THE COURT: The representation is these are --\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Yeah.\n8 THE COURT: -- my limiting instructions given before\n9 Kate and Ms. Farmer testified, and you're asking for\n10 inclusion -- repetition of those limiting instructions where\n11 the violation of New York criminal law is provided.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: That's correct, your Honor. And we\n13 would propose just putting it at the end after the discussion\n14 that's already there.\n15 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach.\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: I think that among other things, your\n17 Honor, I think that would be -- the instruction as you've\n18 crafted it is a correct statement of New York law and the\n19 relevant issues. Adding these instructions would be quite\n20 confusing to the jury. The jury has already heard them. This\n21 is the place where there's no reason to give the Kate\n22 instruction because these jury instructions state specifically\n23 that the jury may not convict based solely on overt acts that\n24 relate to Kate, and so there is no risk, when these full set of\n25 instructions is read to the jury, that they will think that",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014340",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Kate",
      "Ms. Farmer"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014340"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and lawyers regarding jury instructions. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible."
}