DOJ-OGR-00014347.json 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "43",
  4. "document_number": "765",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 43 of 95 LCI1MAX1\n1 of a minor to engage in, so I think we need to change the titles for Count Four, and I can get you the pages in a second, but \"transportation of an individual under 18 to engage in illegal sexual activity.\"\n2\n3\n4\n5 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor, but this actually raises a related question, which is just whether the Court sends the indictment back with the jury, since I think the indictment has the same issue. It describes some of the offenses in their captions as \"of a minor.\"\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10 THE COURT: Well, what are the parties' positions on that?\n11\n12 MR. ROHRBACH: The government is not seeking to send the indictment back, your Honor.\n13\n14 MR. VERDELL: One moment, your Honor.\n15 THE COURT: Yes.\n16 MR. VERDELL: Your Honor, the defense would not like that to happen. We think that the instructions advise the jury about what they need to know about the law.\n17\n18\n19 THE COURT: You're saying you don't want to send the indictment back.\n20\n21 MR. VERDELL: Right.\n22 THE COURT: You're in vigorous agreement.\n23 MR. VERDELL: Oh, I thought we were disagreeing.\n24 That's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that.\n25 THE COURT: I don't send it back unless the parties SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 43 of 95 LCI1MAX1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 of a minor to engage in, so I think we need to change the titles for Count Four, and I can get you the pages in a second, but \"transportation of an individual under 18 to engage in illegal sexual activity.\"\nMR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor, but this actually raises a related question, which is just whether the Court sends the indictment back with the jury, since I think the indictment has the same issue. It describes some of the offenses in their captions as \"of a minor.\"\nTHE COURT: Well, what are the parties' positions on that?\nMR. ROHRBACH: The government is not seeking to send the indictment back, your Honor.\nMR. VERDELL: One moment, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Yes.\nMR. VERDELL: Your Honor, the defense would not like that to happen. We think that the instructions advise the jury about what they need to know about the law.\nTHE COURT: You're saying you don't want to send the indictment back.\nMR. VERDELL: Right.\nTHE COURT: You're in vigorous agreement.\nMR. VERDELL: Oh, I thought we were disagreeing.\nThat's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that.\nTHE COURT: I don't send it back unless the parties",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "MR. ROHRBACH",
  31. "MR. VERDELL"
  32. ],
  33. "organizations": [
  34. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  35. ],
  36. "locations": [],
  37. "dates": [
  38. "08/10/22"
  39. ],
  40. "reference_numbers": [
  41. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  42. "765"
  43. ]
  44. },
  45. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  46. }