DOJ-OGR-00014349.json 3.4 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "45",
  4. "document_number": "765",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 45 of 95 2783 LCI1MAX1\nhappens. But we will double-check it. Thank you.\nOkay. What's next, Mr. Everdell?\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, just page 28, to preserve our suggestion, we would request to substitute the Miller charge. We understand that's been overruled. Lines 11 to 17.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMR. EVERDELL: Then I think we can skip to page 32.\nTHE COURT: That was your first one, right, Mr. Rohrbach?\nMR. ROHRBACH: It was, although, your Honor, we have, in the course of our conversations, resolved that, so the government has no -- our next edit, our next request, is on page 69, actually.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Page 32, Mr. Everdell.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, still on 32 for the defense. We request on line 10, \"This count relates solely to Carolyn.\"\nMR. ROHRBACH: No objection.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Thank you. We'll make that change. Instruction No. 25, line 10, \"This count relates,\" adding the word \"solely,\" \"to Carolyn.\"\nAll right. Mr. Everdell, next page.\nMR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: My clerk notes that we have \"Minor\" in the heading of all the Count Six --\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 45 of 95 2783 LCI1MAX1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "happens. But we will double-check it. Thank you.\nOkay. What's next, Mr. Everdell?\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, just page 28, to preserve our suggestion, we would request to substitute the Miller charge. We understand that's been overruled. Lines 11 to 17.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMR. EVERDELL: Then I think we can skip to page 32.\nTHE COURT: That was your first one, right, Mr. Rohrbach?\nMR. ROHRBACH: It was, although, your Honor, we have, in the course of our conversations, resolved that, so the government has no -- our next edit, our next request, is on page 69, actually.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Page 32, Mr. Everdell.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, still on 32 for the defense. We request on line 10, \"This count relates solely to Carolyn.\"\nMR. ROHRBACH: No objection.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Thank you. We'll make that change. Instruction No. 25, line 10, \"This count relates,\" adding the word \"solely,\" \"to Carolyn.\"\nAll right. Mr. Everdell, next page.\nMR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: My clerk notes that we have \"Minor\" in the heading of all the Count Six --",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "Mr. Everdell",
  31. "Mr. Rohrbach",
  32. "Carolyn"
  33. ],
  34. "organizations": [
  35. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  36. ],
  37. "locations": [],
  38. "dates": [
  39. "08/10/22"
  40. ],
  41. "reference_numbers": [
  42. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  43. "765",
  44. "28",
  45. "32",
  46. "69",
  47. "25",
  48. "10",
  49. "Six"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }