mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014375.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "71",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 95 2809 LCIAMAX2ps\n1 I believe the next one is at page 61.\n2 THE COURT: Did you have something before that?\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: No, page 69.\n4 THE COURT: OK. Page 61.\n5 I have something before that. There is a pronoun on\n6 page 60, line 5, \"he\" should be replaced with \"she.\"\n7 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor.\n8 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: And what page was it, Mr. Everdell?\n10 MR. EVERDELL: The next page is 61, your Honor.\n11 That's instruction 44, credibility of witnesses.\n12 THE COURT: OK.\n13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we would just propose that\n14 there were a number of witnesses who, it came out, had felony\n15 convictions, and there is a Sand instruction on this. It's\n16 instruction 7-12. And we would ask that it be included, at\n17 least in part, in the credibility of witnesses instruction. I\n18 can read that to you, your Honor, if you like.\n19 THE COURT: I gather this was not an original\n20 proposal.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: No. We didn't know if it would come\n22 in.\n23 THE COURT: Oops. All right. I'll take your -- my\n24 clerks will submit language, but go ahead.\n25 MR. EVERDELL: Sure. I have Sand in front of me, and\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014375",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 95 2809 LCIAMAX2ps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 I believe the next one is at page 61.\n2 THE COURT: Did you have something before that?\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: No, page 69.\n4 THE COURT: OK. Page 61.\n5 I have something before that. There is a pronoun on\n6 page 60, line 5, \"he\" should be replaced with \"she.\"\n7 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor.\n8 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: And what page was it, Mr. Everdell?\n10 MR. EVERDELL: The next page is 61, your Honor.\n11 That's instruction 44, credibility of witnesses.\n12 THE COURT: OK.\n13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we would just propose that\n14 there were a number of witnesses who, it came out, had felony\n15 convictions, and there is a Sand instruction on this. It's\n16 instruction 7-12. And we would ask that it be included, at\n17 least in part, in the credibility of witnesses instruction. I\n18 can read that to you, your Honor, if you like.\n19 THE COURT: I gather this was not an original\n20 proposal.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: No. We didn't know if it would come\n22 in.\n23 THE COURT: Oops. All right. I'll take your -- my\n24 clerks will submit language, but go ahead.\n25 MR. EVERDELL: Sure. I have Sand in front of me, and",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014375",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014375"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}