mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014378.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "74",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 95 2812 LCIAMAX2ps testimony of witnesses who were previously convicted of crimes punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in evaluating the witness's credibility. You may consider the fact that the witness who testified was a convicted felon in deciding how much of his testimony to accept and what weight if any it should be given.\" Looks like I gave that in my -- in the United States v. Berry. MR. EVERDELL: I think we've been using that as a model in this charge, your Honor, so we would request a similar instruction here. THE COURT: I would add it, as I did in that last case, as a standalone instruction. Mr. Rohrbach. MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, this is the first we've hoard of this proposal. So if we could have a few hours after the charge conference to give it some thought. We can file a letter saying either, we agree, or, if we have objections to it, articulating those. THE COURT: I think that's fair, and I will look too since it's a new suggestion. I think my proposal would be to just do it as a standalone instruction at, maybe what would be 45-A? MR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor. THE COURT: Between 45 and '6. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014378",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 95 2812 LCIAMAX2ps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "testimony of witnesses who were previously convicted of crimes punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in evaluating the witness's credibility. You may consider the fact that the witness who testified was a convicted felon in deciding how much of his testimony to accept and what weight if any it should be given.\" Looks like I gave that in my -- in the United States v. Berry. MR. EVERDELL: I think we've been using that as a model in this charge, your Honor, so we would request a similar instruction here. THE COURT: I would add it, as I did in that last case, as a standalone instruction. Mr. Rohrbach. MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, this is the first we've hoard of this proposal. So if we could have a few hours after the charge conference to give it some thought. We can file a letter saying either, we agree, or, if we have objections to it, articulating those. THE COURT: I think that's fair, and I will look too since it's a new suggestion. I think my proposal would be to just do it as a standalone instruction at, maybe what would be 45-A? MR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor. THE COURT: Between 45 and '6.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014378",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014378"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}