DOJ-OGR-00014379.json 3.7 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "75",
  4. "document_number": "765",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 95 2813 LCIAMAX2ps\n\n1 So that's the proposal. And when would you like to\n2 put in a letter?\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: Depends on what time we finish.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: First thing, your Honor.\n5 MR. ROHRBACH: If we finish by noon, by 2 or 3?\n6 THE COURT: OK. Let's do 2 o'clock.\n7 MR. ROHRBACH: OK.\n8 THE COURT: Thank you.\n9 Next.\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Next, your Honor, is page 68,\n11 instruction no. 50, the uncalled witnesses charge. The request\n12 here is that this not be included, and I think the reason being\n13 that, in this case, it isn't really accurately summarizing the\n14 state of play, because, you know, for example, there were\n15 witnesses who took their Fifth Amendment rights and refused to\n16 testify as defense witnesses because they invoked their Fifth\n17 Amendment rights. The government does have the option of\n18 giving those witnesses immunity to testify. And so they\n19 actually control, more than we do, whether or not a witness can\n20 appear --\n21 THE COURT: To be clear, that didn't happen. They\n22 didn't call that witness.\n23 MR. EVERDELL: We had a witness who invoked their\n24 Fifth Amendment rights or had written the Court that they\n25 planned to invoke, and that we called and was under subpoena\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014379",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 95 2813 LCIAMAX2ps",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 So that's the proposal. And when would you like to\n2 put in a letter?\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: Depends on what time we finish.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: First thing, your Honor.\n5 MR. ROHRBACH: If we finish by noon, by 2 or 3?\n6 THE COURT: OK. Let's do 2 o'clock.\n7 MR. ROHRBACH: OK.\n8 THE COURT: Thank you.\n9 Next.\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Next, your Honor, is page 68,\n11 instruction no. 50, the uncalled witnesses charge. The request\n12 here is that this not be included, and I think the reason being\n13 that, in this case, it isn't really accurately summarizing the\n14 state of play, because, you know, for example, there were\n15 witnesses who took their Fifth Amendment rights and refused to\n16 testify as defense witnesses because they invoked their Fifth\n17 Amendment rights. The government does have the option of\n18 giving those witnesses immunity to testify. And so they\n19 actually control, more than we do, whether or not a witness can\n20 appear --\n21 THE COURT: To be clear, that didn't happen. They\n22 didn't call that witness.\n23 MR. EVERDELL: We had a witness who invoked their\n24 Fifth Amendment rights or had written the Court that they\n25 planned to invoke, and that we called and was under subpoena",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014379",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. ROHRBACH",
  36. "MR. EVERDELL"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  40. "DOJ"
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "08/10/22"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  48. "765",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00014379"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }