mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014387.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "83",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 83 of 95 2821 LCIAMAX2ps\n\n1 raise something before the charge is given based on the\n2 closing, they can.\n3 THE COURT: I think this is what I typically use, so\n4 we'll stick with that. And obviously closings will not cross\n5 the line as to what I've forbidden, or that may become\n6 necessary.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n8 MR. ROHRBACH: Understood, your Honor. I think that,\n9 just to sort of complete the point, the government's particular\n10 concern is the argument about the empty chair and the\n11 government's motivations for this prosecution, which is\n12 somewhat different than the particular investigative techniques\n13 point that's elsewhere in this instruction, which is why we\n14 thought the additional sentence is necessary.\n15 THE COURT: I didn't permit and there will be no\n16 argument about the government's motivation.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: That's clear, your Honor.\n18 MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.\n19 MR. EVERDELL: All right. Your Honor, we're all set.\n20 Page 73.\n21 THE COURT: Anything before that?\n22 MR. ROHRBACH: No. That was the last edit from the\n23 government, actually.\n24 THE COURT: OK. 73.\n25 MR. EVERDELL: This is the preparation of witnesses\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014387",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 83 of 95 2821 LCIAMAX2ps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 raise something before the charge is given based on the\n2 closing, they can.\n3 THE COURT: I think this is what I typically use, so\n4 we'll stick with that. And obviously closings will not cross\n5 the line as to what I've forbidden, or that may become\n6 necessary.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n8 MR. ROHRBACH: Understood, your Honor. I think that,\n9 just to sort of complete the point, the government's particular\n10 concern is the argument about the empty chair and the\n11 government's motivations for this prosecution, which is\n12 somewhat different than the particular investigative techniques\n13 point that's elsewhere in this instruction, which is why we\n14 thought the additional sentence is necessary.\n15 THE COURT: I didn't permit and there will be no\n16 argument about the government's motivation.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: That's clear, your Honor.\n18 MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.\n19 MR. EVERDELL: All right. Your Honor, we're all set.\n20 Page 73.\n21 THE COURT: Anything before that?\n22 MR. ROHRBACH: No. That was the last edit from the\n23 government, actually.\n24 THE COURT: OK. 73.\n25 MR. EVERDELL: This is the preparation of witnesses",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014387",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014387"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}