mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014395.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "91",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 91 of 95 2829 LCIAMAX2ps\n1 at 9 and the government has a two and a half hour closing, that puts us at 11:30, roughly, give or take. It would be the defense's request we don't break the defense closing through lunch. So I don't know how that impacts the schedule.\n5 THE COURT: We do the best we can, is what I always say.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Understood.\n8 THE COURT: We'll see where we are. We'll adjust and try not to break anything.\n10 I'll have lunch here early, so that's a possibility.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: But, yes, I agree. And, you know, the charge, I think it was about 80 pages. My favorite part of the job is reading the charge.\n16 MS. STERNHEIM: And ours to listen.\n17 THE COURT: Nothing better. But I would guess an hour or so, we should get there.\n19 OK. And the other thing I have on my to-do list, I always have the parties agree on the exhibits that are going back to the jury, and I get that on the record, so forgive me that I'm not sure exactly where we are under COVID protocols.\n23 There was a time under COVID protocols where only electronic exhibits went back. I think, and Ms. Williams isn't here to tell me what's what, but I think now paper can go. Why don't\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014395",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 91 of 95 2829 LCIAMAX2ps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 at 9 and the government has a two and a half hour closing, that puts us at 11:30, roughly, give or take. It would be the defense's request we don't break the defense closing through lunch. So I don't know how that impacts the schedule.\n5 THE COURT: We do the best we can, is what I always say.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Understood.\n8 THE COURT: We'll see where we are. We'll adjust and try not to break anything.\n10 I'll have lunch here early, so that's a possibility.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: But, yes, I agree. And, you know, the charge, I think it was about 80 pages. My favorite part of the job is reading the charge.\n16 MS. STERNHEIM: And ours to listen.\n17 THE COURT: Nothing better. But I would guess an hour or so, we should get there.\n19 OK. And the other thing I have on my to-do list, I always have the parties agree on the exhibits that are going back to the jury, and I get that on the record, so forgive me that I'm not sure exactly where we are under COVID protocols.\n23 There was a time under COVID protocols where only electronic exhibits went back. I think, and Ms. Williams isn't here to tell me what's what, but I think now paper can go. Why don't",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014395",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. WILLIAMS"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014395"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}