DOJ-OGR-00014471.json 4.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "71",
  4. "document_number": "767",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 257 2904\nLCKVMAX4\n\nSummation - Ms. Moe\n\n1 Her testimony was a total distraction. You saw the\n2 witnesses yourself. They were not talking about one time that\n3 they saw a fake car crash. They were telling you about how\n4 they were sexually abused again and again and again. You heard\n5 them tell you about their worst memories, and that's why this\n6 is a case about memory.\n7\n8 As jurors, you understand how memory works from your\n9 own lives, and that's how you know it just doesn't make any\n10 sense to say that Jane and Annie and Carolyn and Kate all\n11 imagined this, or that they're experiencing some kind of false\n12 memory of something that never happened. Again and again at\n13 this trial you saw the lengths the defense went to in order to\n14 try to discredit the witnesses, because their testimony was\n15 devastating evidence of Maxwell's guilt.\n16 I want to talk about that for just a moment. Let's\n17 talk about just two examples.\n18 Remember that in a cross-examination of Jane, when the\n19 defense repeatedly tried to suggest that Jane had said on her\n20 application to Interlochen that nothing was difficult for her?\n21 This is Defense Exhibit J-3. This went on for question after\n22 question, as the defense tried to suggest that Jane was lying\n23 about her difficult home life. Here it is. The defense\n24 pointed her to the Interlochen application twice to suggest\n25 this. Here's part of the transcript where that happened.\n\n You wrote that. When asked about something difficult,\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014471",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 257 2904",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LCKVMAX4",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Summation - Ms. Moe",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "1 Her testimony was a total distraction. You saw the\n2 witnesses yourself. They were not talking about one time that\n3 they saw a fake car crash. They were telling you about how\n4 they were sexually abused again and again and again. You heard\n5 them tell you about their worst memories, and that's why this\n6 is a case about memory.\n7\n8 As jurors, you understand how memory works from your\n9 own lives, and that's how you know it just doesn't make any\n10 sense to say that Jane and Annie and Carolyn and Kate all\n11 imagined this, or that they're experiencing some kind of false\n12 memory of something that never happened. Again and again at\n13 this trial you saw the lengths the defense went to in order to\n14 try to discredit the witnesses, because their testimony was\n15 devastating evidence of Maxwell's guilt.\n16 I want to talk about that for just a moment. Let's\n17 talk about just two examples.\n18 Remember that in a cross-examination of Jane, when the\n19 defense repeatedly tried to suggest that Jane had said on her\n20 application to Interlochen that nothing was difficult for her?\n21 This is Defense Exhibit J-3. This went on for question after\n22 question, as the defense tried to suggest that Jane was lying\n23 about her difficult home life. Here it is. The defense\n24 pointed her to the Interlochen application twice to suggest\n25 this. Here's part of the transcript where that happened.",
  30. "position": "main content"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "You wrote that. When asked about something difficult,",
  35. "position": "main content"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014471",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Jane",
  51. "Annie",
  52. "Carolyn",
  53. "Kate",
  54. "Maxwell",
  55. "Ms. Moe"
  56. ],
  57. "organizations": [
  58. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  59. ],
  60. "locations": [
  61. "Interlochen"
  62. ],
  63. "dates": [
  64. "08/10/22"
  65. ],
  66. "reference_numbers": [
  67. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  68. "767",
  69. "DOJ-OGR-00014471"
  70. ]
  71. },
  72. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript from a trial involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is a summation by Ms. Moe, discussing the testimony of witnesses and the defense's attempts to discredit them. The document is well-formatted and mostly free of errors or damage."
  73. }