mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014476.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "76",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 76 of 257 2909 LCKVMAX4\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: One moment, please.\n2 (Counsel conferred)\n3 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, if I may just from here, I\n4 think our application would be a limiting instruction\n5 correcting the misstatement.\n6 THE COURT: Specifically?\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: That the statement that the massage\n8 table having been manufactured or sent from California is a\n9 sufficient element to satisfy the interstate commerce clause of\n10 Counts Five and Six.\n11 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, just reading from the\n12 Court's charge, it affects interstate commerce to use products\n13 that traveled in interstate commerce, that's exactly the\n14 situation here.\n15 THE COURT: You pulled away from the microphone.\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Just reading from the Court's charge,\n17 it affects interstate commerce to use products that traveled in\n18 interstate commerce, that is exactly what Ms. Moe said here.\n19 And, of course, the massage table was used in the course of the\n20 crime here.\n21 MS. STERNHEIM: I'd also add that there was no\n22 identification of that specific massage table as the one that\n23 was used in connection with these offenses.\n24 MR. ROHRBACH: At a minimum, your Honor, this is the\n25 massage table seized in 2005. The jury can infer it was used\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 76 of 257 2909 LCKVMAX4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: One moment, please.\n2 (Counsel conferred)\n3 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, if I may just from here, I\n4 think our application would be a limiting instruction\n5 correcting the misstatement.\n6 THE COURT: Specifically?\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: That the statement that the massage\n8 table having been manufactured or sent from California is a\n9 sufficient element to satisfy the interstate commerce clause of\n10 Counts Five and Six.\n11 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, just reading from the\n12 Court's charge, it affects interstate commerce to use products\n13 that traveled in interstate commerce, that's exactly the\n14 situation here.\n15 THE COURT: You pulled away from the microphone.\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Just reading from the Court's charge,\n17 it affects interstate commerce to use products that traveled in\n18 interstate commerce, that is exactly what Ms. Moe said here.\n19 And, of course, the massage table was used in the course of the\n20 crime here.\n21 MS. STERNHEIM: I'd also add that there was no\n22 identification of that specific massage table as the one that\n23 was used in connection with these offenses.\n24 MR. ROHRBACH: At a minimum, your Honor, this is the\n25 massage table seized in 2005. The jury can infer it was used",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "California"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "2005"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}