mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014495.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "95",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 95 of 257 2929 LCKCmax5 Summation - Ms. Menninger\n\nBut in terms of Ghislaine Maxwell's lifestyle, do you know what it was before she met Jeffrey Epstein? No, because the government didn't tell you about that. Do you know what it was after she left Jeffrey Epstein? No, because the government didn't tell you about that. Do you know her financial situation? Do you know whether she had luxury in her life? You saw photos of her that they showed you wearing tartan or hunting with dogs in the U.K., it looks from the pictures. So maybe it was Jeffrey that needed Ghislaine and her connections and not the other way around.\n\nAnd does that motive even make sense for a woman in her 30s, that she needs this lifestyle, so she's just willing to drag 14-year-olds in for sexual abuse? Use your common sense.\n\nAnd if that's the case, your Honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, then why wouldn't Eva Dubin be telling you the same thing? She dated Jeffrey Epstein for a decade. She saw nothing abnormal. She let her kids hang around with Jeffrey Epstein. She went on to marry a billionaire.\n\nNot one witness came in to tell you that Ghislaine Maxwell needed Jeffrey Epstein's lifestyle so bad she was willing to perpetrate on young females.\n\nI'm going to take some time now, after talking about the promises the government did not keep to you in their opening, and go through each one of these women's stories and\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014495",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 95 of 257 2929 LCKCmax5 Summation - Ms. Menninger",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "But in terms of Ghislaine Maxwell's lifestyle, do you know what it was before she met Jeffrey Epstein? No, because the government didn't tell you about that. Do you know what it was after she left Jeffrey Epstein? No, because the government didn't tell you about that. Do you know her financial situation? Do you know whether she had luxury in her life? You saw photos of her that they showed you wearing tartan or hunting with dogs in the U.K., it looks from the pictures. So maybe it was Jeffrey that needed Ghislaine and her connections and not the other way around.\n\nAnd does that motive even make sense for a woman in her 30s, that she needs this lifestyle, so she's just willing to drag 14-year-olds in for sexual abuse? Use your common sense.\n\nAnd if that's the case, your Honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, then why wouldn't Eva Dubin be telling you the same thing? She dated Jeffrey Epstein for a decade. She saw nothing abnormal. She let her kids hang around with Jeffrey Epstein. She went on to marry a billionaire.\n\nNot one witness came in to tell you that Ghislaine Maxwell needed Jeffrey Epstein's lifestyle so bad she was willing to perpetrate on young females.\n\nI'm going to take some time now, after talking about the promises the government did not keep to you in their opening, and go through each one of these women's stories and",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014495",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Eva Dubin"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "U.K."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014495"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the reporting agency."
}