mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014516.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "116 of 257",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Summation",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 116 of 257 2950 LCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger\n\n1 MS. MENNINGER: She was awarded one and a half million dollars for that.\n2\n3 But there's no dispute Ghislaine Maxwell had nothing to do with getting her to New York, and nothing to do with touching her in a movie theater. And there's no dispute that the reason she went to New York was to see her sister. So the purpose of her trip was to see her sister.\n4\n5 Ghislaine wasn't at the movies. She didn't meet Ghislaine during the trip. She didn't fly her to the trip, she didn't arrange for the travel, she didn't call her mother before she traveled, she didn't encourage her to travel to New York. She never even, as you know and I know, heard of Ghislaine Maxwell when she went on that trip to New York. Ghislaine was simply nowhere around.\n6\n7 And so Ghislaine couldn't have been making her feel more comfortable or normalizing sexual talk. She wasn't even there, as Annie's diaries confirm. Ghislaine is never mentioned in those diaries. Even though we don't have all of the diaries, she's clear that there is no mention in any entry of any journal about Ghislaine Maxwell. And that's true from the journal you saw some photos of, and that's true for the ones she didn't show you.\n8\n9 She admitted that reviewing those journals helps her remember things that happened in hindsight. She said her memories are colored by hindsight, and that what happened to\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014516",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 116 of 257 2950 LCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MENNINGER: She was awarded one and a half million dollars for that. But there's no dispute Ghislaine Maxwell had nothing to do with getting her to New York, and nothing to do with touching her in a movie theater. And there's no dispute that the reason she went to New York was to see her sister. So the purpose of her trip was to see her sister. Ghislaine wasn't at the movies. She didn't meet Ghislaine during the trip. She didn't fly her to the trip, she didn't arrange for the travel, she didn't call her mother before she traveled, she didn't encourage her to travel to New York. She never even, as you know and I know, heard of Ghislaine Maxwell when she went on that trip to New York. Ghislaine was simply nowhere around. And so Ghislaine couldn't have been making her feel more comfortable or normalizing sexual talk. She wasn't even there, as Annie's diaries confirm. Ghislaine is never mentioned in those diaries. Even though we don't have all of the diaries, she's clear that there is no mention in any entry of any journal about Ghislaine Maxwell. And that's true from the journal you saw some photos of, and that's true for the ones she didn't show you. She admitted that reviewing those journals helps her remember things that happened in hindsight. She said her memories are colored by hindsight, and that what happened to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014516",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Annie",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014516"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}