mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014529.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "129",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Summation",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 129 of 257 2963 LCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger\n\n1 Twelve years ago she was asked under oath to answer\n2 questions about who was involved in the trafficking of her or\n3 the sexual abuse of her. And she had lawyers who helped her\n4 answer those questions. And again, she didn't say anything\n5 about Ghislaine Maxwell. And then she even updated her answers\n6 again. So she's looking at her answers to make sure that they\n7 are accurate. And once again, she does not mention anything\n8 about Maxwell.\n9 She had a third opportunity to talk about who was involved\n10 in this operation at the Epstein home. She gave a deposition.\n11 And the deposition went on for hours. And she was asked in that\n12 deposition, Are all of the things in your civil complaint accurate?\n13 Do they include everything? Are they complete? Are they true?\n14\n15 And she said, Yes, they are.\n16 Not one mention of Ghislaine Maxwell in hours of\n17 deposition testimony back in 2009. She may have mentioned that\n18 Maxwell answered the phone once. But guess what? The government\n19 grabbed all of those message pads which they talked to you about,\n20 and there are message pads and there are message pads, and you will\n21 get all these message pads back in the jury deliberation room.\n22 And you will see there's not one single message for Ghislaine\n23 Maxwell having to do with Carolyn. She's calling for Epstein.\n24\n25 And look at the name on GX-2T in the upper right-hand\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014529",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 129 of 257 2963 LCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Twelve years ago she was asked under oath to answer questions about who was involved in the trafficking of her or the sexual abuse of her. And she had lawyers who helped her answer those questions. And again, she didn't say anything about Ghislaine Maxwell. And then she even updated her answers again. So she's looking at her answers to make sure that they are accurate. And once again, she does not mention anything about Maxwell. She had a third opportunity to talk about who was involved in this operation at the Epstein home. She gave a deposition. And the deposition went on for hours. And she was asked in that deposition, Are all of the things in your civil complaint accurate? Do they include everything? Are they complete? Are they true? And she said, Yes, they are. Not one mention of Ghislaine Maxwell in hours of deposition testimony back in 2009. She may have mentioned that Maxwell answered the phone once. But guess what? The government grabbed all of those message pads which they talked to you about, and there are message pads and there are message pads, and you will get all these message pads back in the jury deliberation room. And you will see there's not one single message for Ghislaine Maxwell having to do with Carolyn. She's calling for Epstein. And look at the name on GX-2T in the upper right-hand",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014529",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Carolyn",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "2009"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014529"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}