mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014549.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "149",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 257 2983\nLCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger\n1 not mere presence around someone else who is violating the law;\n2 it's an agreement to help that person. It's different from an\n3 actual violation yourself of the law. And Counts Two, Four,\n4 and Six are the ones that charge her with actually being the\n5 one to violate the law. So it's a little confusing, but these\n6 come in pairs, as you see from the color coding.\n7 One and Two are the conspiracy and the substantive\n8 count for enticement or persuading someone under the age of 17\n9 to travel to engage in a legal sexual activity. Count One is\n10 the conspiracy, Count Two is the substantive count.\n11 The same is true for Counts Three and Four; they are\n12 the substantive and the conspiracy counts for transportation.\n13 And Five and Six are the same for sex trafficking.\n14 It's very important that you understand that certain\n15 counts relate to certain accusers. So, for example, Counts Two\n16 and Four are entirely based on Jane. If you don't believe\n17 Jane, you just acquit Ms. Maxwell right away of Counts Two and\n18 Four.\n19 (Continued on next page)\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014549",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 257 2983",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 not mere presence around someone else who is violating the law;\n2 it's an agreement to help that person. It's different from an\n3 actual violation yourself of the law. And Counts Two, Four,\n4 and Six are the ones that charge her with actually being the\n5 one to violate the law. So it's a little confusing, but these\n6 come in pairs, as you see from the color coding.\n7 One and Two are the conspiracy and the substantive\n8 count for enticement or persuading someone under the age of 17\n9 to travel to engage in a legal sexual activity. Count One is\n10 the conspiracy, Count Two is the substantive count.\n11 The same is true for Counts Three and Four; they are\n12 the substantive and the conspiracy counts for transportation.\n13 And Five and Six are the same for sex trafficking.\n14 It's very important that you understand that certain\n15 counts relate to certain accusers. So, for example, Counts Two\n16 and Four are entirely based on Jane. If you don't believe\n17 Jane, you just acquit Ms. Maxwell right away of Counts Two and\n18 Four.\n19 (Continued on next page)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014549",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014549"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is from the Southern District Reporters, P.C. and contains a reference number DOJ-OGR-00014549."
}