mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014550.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "150",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 150 of 257 2984 LCKCmax7 Summation - Ms. Menninger 1 MS. MENNINGER: And Count Six only relates to Carolyn. 2 So if you don't believe Carolyn or if you have a reasonable 3 doubt about Carolyn adding Ghislaine to the story, you just 4 acquit her on that charge, as well. 5 And there are numerous reasons why you should have 6 substantial reasonable doubt in this case. 7 But before I get to that, let's talk about conspiracy. 8 Judge Nathan will explain to you that conspiracy is an 9 agreement to accomplish something unlawful, and the 10 government's theory is that Epstein and Maxwell agreed that 11 they would encourage or arrange for females under the age of 17 12 to travel to New York to engage in sex acts with Epstein, and 13 New York law provides that an adult of someone under 17 cannot 14 legally consent to have sexual contact. 15 So, what did Annie Farmer and Kate and Carolyn have to 16 do with that violation of New York law? Nothing. Carolyn 17 never went to New York. She never traveled anywhere. Any 18 suggestion that she was asked to travel was something she added 19 in the last year after her first lawsuits were over and her 20 money was gone and she was adding Ghislaine Maxwell to the 21 case. 22 Annie came to New York through no involvement of 23 Ghislaine Maxwell. As she told you, quite clearly on the stand 24 and after she went to New Mexico, nobody asked her to travel 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014550",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 150 of 257 2984 LCKCmax7 Summation - Ms. Menninger",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MENNINGER: And Count Six only relates to Carolyn. So if you don't believe Carolyn or if you have a reasonable doubt about Carolyn adding Ghislaine to the story, you just acquit her on that charge, as well. And there are numerous reasons why you should have substantial reasonable doubt in this case. But before I get to that, let's talk about conspiracy. Judge Nathan will explain to you that conspiracy is an agreement to accomplish something unlawful, and the government's theory is that Epstein and Maxwell agreed that they would encourage or arrange for females under the age of 17 to travel to New York to engage in sex acts with Epstein, and New York law provides that an adult of someone under 17 cannot legally consent to have sexual contact. So, what did Annie Farmer and Kate and Carolyn have to do with that violation of New York law? Nothing. Carolyn never went to New York. She never traveled anywhere. Any suggestion that she was asked to travel was something she added in the last year after her first lawsuits were over and her money was gone and she was adding Ghislaine Maxwell to the case. Annie came to New York through no involvement of Ghislaine Maxwell. As she told you, quite clearly on the stand and after she went to New Mexico, nobody asked her to travel",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014550",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Annie Farmer",
      "Kate",
      "Epstein",
      "Judge Nathan",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014550"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript from a trial involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is typed and there are no visible redactions or damage."
}