mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014567.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "167",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Rebuttal - Ms. Comey",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 167 of 257 3001 LCKCmax7 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey York. Epstein wanted to get her back in his clutches as quickly as he could, and he wanted his right-hand woman there to help groom her. That's how you know it happened in '96. And this thing about flight records, also a distraction. If you want to take a look for yourself, go to Government Exhibit 662 at page 40, look at the flight on March 29th, 1996. You'll see Jeffrey Epstein flying to Santa Fe, New Mexico. The next flight is more than a week later, April 8th, 1996. Maxwell is on that next flight with Epstein. That span of time of more than a week covers a weekend. Take a look at that, ladies and gentlemen. And third, Ms. Menninger talked a lot about Jane's testimony on cross examination. And to give you an example of some supposedly \"aha\" moment, she showed you a question that she asked Jane that was written like a riddle. Remember that question, it was, you don't recall Maxwell and Epstein being in the room, correct, and Jane answered no. What that means is, no, that's not correct. Ms. Menninger was trying to mislead you about what the answer to that riddle-like question meant just like she was trying to mislead you about what nothing has ever been difficult for me meant on that Interlochen application. Don't be distracted by that nonsense. I want to walk through the main arguments at the core of what the defense has said to you today about these witnesses. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014567",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 167 of 257 3001 LCKCmax7 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "York. Epstein wanted to get her back in his clutches as quickly as he could, and he wanted his right-hand woman there to help groom her. That's how you know it happened in '96. And this thing about flight records, also a distraction. If you want to take a look for yourself, go to Government Exhibit 662 at page 40, look at the flight on March 29th, 1996. You'll see Jeffrey Epstein flying to Santa Fe, New Mexico. The next flight is more than a week later, April 8th, 1996. Maxwell is on that next flight with Epstein. That span of time of more than a week covers a weekend. Take a look at that, ladies and gentlemen. And third, Ms. Menninger talked a lot about Jane's testimony on cross examination. And to give you an example of some supposedly \"aha\" moment, she showed you a question that she asked Jane that was written like a riddle. Remember that question, it was, you don't recall Maxwell and Epstein being in the room, correct, and Jane answered no. What that means is, no, that's not correct. Ms. Menninger was trying to mislead you about what the answer to that riddle-like question meant just like she was trying to mislead you about what nothing has ever been difficult for me meant on that Interlochen application. Don't be distracted by that nonsense. I want to walk through the main arguments at the core of what the defense has said to you today about these witnesses.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014567",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Maxwell",
      "Jane",
      "Ms. Comey",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "York",
      "Santa Fe",
      "New Mexico",
      "Interlochen"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "March 29th, 1996",
      "April 8th, 1996",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "662",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014567"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}