mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014571.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "171",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 171 of 257 3005 LCKCmax7 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey event. And you know Jane was 14 when she met Maxwell and Epstein. She vividly remembers being 14 years old when that abuse began. It was within a year of her father dying. That's an anchoring way for her to hold onto that memory and know she was 14. It's also what she told Matt a decade ago long before this trial. And there are documents to confirm she's right. You saw the Interlochen records putting her and the defendant and Epstein all at Interlochen the same summer of 1994. You saw the flight records putting Maxwell and Epstein there that summer. It is so clear that Jane was 14 when she met these predators. Now the defense tries to wiggle out of that by suggesting that Jane's estimation that she was approximately 15 on Mike Wallace's birthday somehow means that she got that date wrong. Ladies and gentlemen, which would stand out more in your mind, how old you were on Mike Wallace's birthday or how old you were the first time a middle-aged man molested you? It is obvious that Jane remembers these core events clearly, and that is what matters. And hypothetically, let's just say the defense was right. Let's just say that she got the timing of her first meeting wrong, that it was actually that last summer when she turned 16 in 1996, and you know that she knew them by the time she was 16 because you saw the flight records putting her on those planes with defendant and Epstein going to New York when SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014571",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 171 of 257 3005 LCKCmax7 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "event. And you know Jane was 14 when she met Maxwell and Epstein. She vividly remembers being 14 years old when that abuse began. It was within a year of her father dying. That's an anchoring way for her to hold onto that memory and know she was 14. It's also what she told Matt a decade ago long before this trial. And there are documents to confirm she's right. You saw the Interlochen records putting her and the defendant and Epstein all at Interlochen the same summer of 1994. You saw the flight records putting Maxwell and Epstein there that summer. It is so clear that Jane was 14 when she met these predators. Now the defense tries to wiggle out of that by suggesting that Jane's estimation that she was approximately 15 on Mike Wallace's birthday somehow means that she got that date wrong. Ladies and gentlemen, which would stand out more in your mind, how old you were on Mike Wallace's birthday or how old you were the first time a middle-aged man molested you? It is obvious that Jane remembers these core events clearly, and that is what matters. And hypothetically, let's just say the defense was right. Let's just say that she got the timing of her first meeting wrong, that it was actually that last summer when she turned 16 in 1996, and you know that she knew them by the time she was 16 because you saw the flight records putting her on those planes with defendant and Epstein going to New York when",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014571",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Matt",
      "Mike Wallace"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Interlochen",
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1994",
      "1996"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014571"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}