mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014575.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "175",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 257 LCKCmax7 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey story about the defendant? And it makes no sense for the other lawyers to push this supposedly made up story about the defendant when they've already gotten paid. Remember, the payments have all been made, the lawyers got their money long before this trial started. And you know these lawyers didn't just implant the defendant into these victims' minds. Jane, Carolyn, and Annie all talked about Maxwell, remembered her as part of their experiences a long, long time ago. They all included her in their accounts before there was some supposed incentive for a payday. Annie mentioned it to Dave Mulligan, her high school boyfriend, and the FBI in 2006. She told both of them how Maxwell touched her breasts during a massage. Jane told Matt, her boyfriend from a decade ago, about the woman who would make her feel comfortable in the room. Carolyn mentioned meeting the woman with short black hair and an accent to the FBI in 2007. She mentioned Maxwell twice in her deposition, and she told Sean that she saw Maxwell at the house at that time, way before there was a compensation fund or any incentive to add in Maxwell if it wasn't true. And that timing is crucial here because it completely guts the whole defense theory. The defense suggests that some lawyers made everything up about Maxwell to get money, but even if adding Maxwell in to get money could get you money, which is not true, there is no universe in which that was the case when SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014575",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 257 LCKCmax7 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "story about the defendant? And it makes no sense for the other lawyers to push this supposedly made up story about the defendant when they've already gotten paid. Remember, the payments have all been made, the lawyers got their money long before this trial started. And you know these lawyers didn't just implant the defendant into these victims' minds. Jane, Carolyn, and Annie all talked about Maxwell, remembered her as part of their experiences a long, long time ago. They all included her in their accounts before there was some supposed incentive for a payday. Annie mentioned it to Dave Mulligan, her high school boyfriend, and the FBI in 2006. She told both of them how Maxwell touched her breasts during a massage. Jane told Matt, her boyfriend from a decade ago, about the woman who would make her feel comfortable in the room. Carolyn mentioned meeting the woman with short black hair and an accent to the FBI in 2007. She mentioned Maxwell twice in her deposition, and she told Sean that she saw Maxwell at the house at that time, way before there was a compensation fund or any incentive to add in Maxwell if it wasn't true. And that timing is crucial here because it completely guts the whole defense theory. The defense suggests that some lawyers made everything up about Maxwell to get money, but even if adding Maxwell in to get money could get you money, which is not true, there is no universe in which that was the case when",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014575",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Jane",
      "Carolyn",
      "Annie",
      "Dave Mulligan",
      "Matt",
      "Sean"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "FBI",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "2006",
      "2007"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014575"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case against Maxwell. The text is typed and there are no visible redactions or damage."
}