mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014577.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "177",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 177 of 257 LCKVMAX8 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey MS. COMEY: Finally, there is this, frankly, desperate suggestion that the FBI manipulated these witnesses; asked leading questions to fit a narrative. Let me be very clear here. There is not one shred of evidence to support that in this case. Ms. Menninger seemed to improvise, ad-libbed, made up, some theoretical questions that she'd like to think that the FBI asked some of these witnesses in their meetings with the government. But you didn't hear anything about that on the witness stand or the exhibits in this case. What you did hear was Special Agent Young. She told you how she values being ethical. She told you it matters to her that a victim's memory is her memory. Not a single witness at this trial suggested for even a moment that the FBI told them what to say. Remember, every single witness who was asked told you flat out, the only thing the governed asked of them was to tell the truth. And you know that's what they did here. Really the whole memory thing makes no sense at all. There is no way that Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie just misremembered the defendant's core role in abusing them. So what does that leave the defense with? They are all liars. In order for the defense to be right, for the defendant not to have known about the abuse, for the defendant not to have participated in it, witness after witness after witness must have lied to you. Jane and Kate and Carolyn and Annie must SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014577",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 177 of 257 LCKVMAX8 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. COMEY: Finally, there is this, frankly, desperate suggestion that the FBI manipulated these witnesses; asked leading questions to fit a narrative. Let me be very clear here. There is not one shred of evidence to support that in this case. Ms. Menninger seemed to improvise, ad-libbed, made up, some theoretical questions that she'd like to think that the FBI asked some of these witnesses in their meetings with the government. But you didn't hear anything about that on the witness stand or the exhibits in this case. What you did hear was Special Agent Young. She told you how she values being ethical. She told you it matters to her that a victim's memory is her memory. Not a single witness at this trial suggested for even a moment that the FBI told them what to say. Remember, every single witness who was asked told you flat out, the only thing the governed asked of them was to tell the truth. And you know that's what they did here. Really the whole memory thing makes no sense at all. There is no way that Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie just misremembered the defendant's core role in abusing them. So what does that leave the defense with? They are all liars. In order for the defense to be right, for the defendant not to have known about the abuse, for the defendant not to have participated in it, witness after witness after witness must have lied to you. Jane and Kate and Carolyn and Annie must",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014577",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Comey",
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Special Agent Young",
      "Jane",
      "Kate",
      "Carolyn",
      "Annie"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "FBI",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014577"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with no visible redactions or damage."
}