mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014621.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "221",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 221 of 257 3055 LCKCmax9 Charge\n\n1 Ms. Maxwell had such an interest, that is a factor which you may properly consider in determining whether or not she was a member of the conspiracy charged in the indictment.\n2\n3 Once a conspiracy is formed, it is presumed to continue until either its objective is accomplished or there is some affirmative act of termination by the members. So too, once a person is found to be a member of a conspiracy, she is presumed to continue as a member in that conspiracy until the conspiracy is terminated unless it's shown by some affirmative proof that the person withdrew and disassociated herself prosecute it.\n4\n5 In sum, the defendant, with an understanding of the unlawful nature of the conspiracy, may have intentionally engaged, advised, or assisted in the conspiracy for the purpose of furthering an illegal undertaking. The defendant thereby becomes a knowing and willful participant in the unlawful agreement, that is to say, she becomes a conspirator.\n6\n7 Instruction No. 36: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law - Third Element.\n8\n9 The third element that the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to establish the offense of conspiracy is that at least one overt act was knowingly committed by at least one of the conspirators. The overt act element requires the government to show something more than mere agreement. Some overt step or action must have been taken\n10\n11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014621",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 221 of 257 3055 LCKCmax9 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Ms. Maxwell had such an interest, that is a factor which you may properly consider in determining whether or not she was a member of the conspiracy charged in the indictment.\n\nOnce a conspiracy is formed, it is presumed to continue until either its objective is accomplished or there is some affirmative act of termination by the members. So too, once a person is found to be a member of a conspiracy, she is presumed to continue as a member in that conspiracy until the conspiracy is terminated unless it's shown by some affirmative proof that the person withdrew and disassociated herself prosecute it.\n\nIn sum, the defendant, with an understanding of the unlawful nature of the conspiracy, may have intentionally engaged, advised, or assisted in the conspiracy for the purpose of furthering an illegal undertaking. The defendant thereby becomes a knowing and willful participant in the unlawful agreement, that is to say, she becomes a conspirator.\n\nInstruction No. 36: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law - Third Element.\n\nThe third element that the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to establish the offense of conspiracy is that at least one overt act was knowingly committed by at least one of the conspirators. The overt act element requires the government to show something more than mere agreement. Some overt step or action must have been taken",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014621",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014621"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is from the Southern District Reporters, P.C. and includes a reference number."
}