mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014640.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "240",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 240 of 257 LCKCmax9 Charge 1 shows on different occasions Ms. Maxwell engaged in conduct similar to the charges in the indictment. It is for you to decide whether Ms. Maxwell engaged in the other conduct. Let me remind you that Ms. Maxwell is on trial only for committing acts alleged in the indictment. Accordingly, you may consider this evidence of similar acts as a substitute -- you may not consider this evidence -- let me start that sentence again. Accordingly, you may not consider this evidence of similar acts as a substitute for proof that Ms. Maxwell committed the crimes charged nor may you consider this evidence as proof that Ms. Maxwell has a criminal personality or bad character. The evidence of the other similar acts was admitted for a much more limited purpose and you may consider it only for that limited purpose. If you determine that Ms. Maxwell committed the acts charged in the indictment and the similar acts, as well, then you may, but you need not draw an inference that in doing the acts charged in the indictment, that Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly and intentionally and not because of some mistake, accident, or other innocent reasons. You may also consider this evidence in determining whether Ms. Maxwell utilized a scheme or common plan in committing both the crimes charged in the indictment and the similar acts introduced by the government. Evidence of similar acts may not be considered by you SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014640",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 240 of 257 LCKCmax9 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 shows on different occasions Ms. Maxwell engaged in conduct similar to the charges in the indictment. It is for you to decide whether Ms. Maxwell engaged in the other conduct. Let me remind you that Ms. Maxwell is on trial only for committing acts alleged in the indictment. Accordingly, you may consider this evidence of similar acts as a substitute -- you may not consider this evidence -- let me start that sentence again. Accordingly, you may not consider this evidence of similar acts as a substitute for proof that Ms. Maxwell committed the crimes charged nor may you consider this evidence as proof that Ms. Maxwell has a criminal personality or bad character. The evidence of the other similar acts was admitted for a much more limited purpose and you may consider it only for that limited purpose. If you determine that Ms. Maxwell committed the acts charged in the indictment and the similar acts, as well, then you may, but you need not draw an inference that in doing the acts charged in the indictment, that Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly and intentionally and not because of some mistake, accident, or other innocent reasons. You may also consider this evidence in determining whether Ms. Maxwell utilized a scheme or common plan in committing both the crimes charged in the indictment and the similar acts introduced by the government. Evidence of similar acts may not be considered by you",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014640",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014640"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or jury instruction from a trial involving Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
}