mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014664.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "769",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 19 3097\nLCLVMAXT\nexhibit. The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.\nAgreed?\nMS. COMEY: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Agreed.\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\nAll right. I will do that.\nAnd we'll wait to hear further.\n(Recess pending verdict)\nTHE COURT: I'm told that you requested I return.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.\nAfter the Court left and I thought about it, there's other testimony regarding this exhibit, specifically from Special Agent Jason Richards. We all can't agree on what was in the note, and it may be important for us to hear exactly what was in the note again before we have some consensus on this.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may we receive copies of the court exhibits please?\nTHE COURT: You mean the notes?\nMS. STERNHEIM: Yes.\nTHE COURT: They need to be redacted because the foreperson has signed their name.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Understood.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: My request is going to be that in\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014664",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 19 3097",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCLVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "exhibit. The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.\nAgreed?\nMS. COMEY: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Agreed.\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\nAll right. I will do that.\nAnd we'll wait to hear further.\n(Recess pending verdict)\nTHE COURT: I'm told that you requested I return.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.\nAfter the Court left and I thought about it, there's other testimony regarding this exhibit, specifically from Special Agent Jason Richards. We all can't agree on what was in the note, and it may be important for us to hear exactly what was in the note again before we have some consensus on this.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may we receive copies of the court exhibits please?\nTHE COURT: You mean the notes?\nMS. STERNHEIM: Yes.\nTHE COURT: They need to be redacted because the foreperson has signed their name.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Understood.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: My request is going to be that in",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014664",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "Jason Richards",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "769",
      "3505-005",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014664"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage on this page."
}