mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014680.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "771",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 771 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 7 3112 LCMCMAXT\n\n1 (Jury not present)\n2 THE COURT: Good afternoon, everyone. We haven't\n3 heard anything from the jury, so I think it is time to consider\n4 putting in a note regarding tomorrow since we don't have a\n5 response on that. So the note I have drafted, with your input,\n6 let me know, \"Hello, jury. If your deliberations are not\n7 completed today, do you wish to deliberate tomorrow, Thursday,\n8 December 23rd?\" And then I have a box for \"yes\" and a box for\n9 \"no.\" \"Please check yes or no. If yes, what time would you\n10 like to deliberate from? Blank a.m. to blank p.m. Judge\n11 Nathan.\"\n12 Any thoughts or requests?\n13 MS. COMEY: Seems perfect.\n14 MS. STERNHEIM: Fine. Thank you.\n15 THE COURT: What I'll do is we'll send that in and I\n16 think everybody just wait, my assumption is it will come right\n17 back out and we'll reconvene. I'll see you in a moment.\n18 (Recess)\n19 THE COURT: As that went in, a note came out. So I\n20 don't have a response yet, but I have a note.\n21 \"May we please have the following testimonies in a\n22 binder.\" The first one is Jane, Wong, Kate. There is\n23 something else written next to Jane.\n24 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I'm not reading the note, but\n25 they got Jane. It wasn't in a binder.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 771 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 7 3112 LCMCMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Jury not present)\nTHE COURT: Good afternoon, everyone. We haven't\nheard anything from the jury, so I think it is time to consider\nputting in a note regarding tomorrow since we don't have a\nresponse on that. So the note I have drafted, with your input,\nlet me know, \"Hello, jury. If your deliberations are not\ncompleted today, do you wish to deliberate tomorrow, Thursday,\nDecember 23rd?\" And then I have a box for \"yes\" and a box for\n\"no.\" \"Please check yes or no. If yes, what time would you\nlike to deliberate from? Blank a.m. to blank p.m. Judge\nNathan.\"\nAny thoughts or requests?\nMS. COMEY: Seems perfect.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Fine. Thank you.\nTHE COURT: What I'll do is we'll send that in and I\nthink everybody just wait, my assumption is it will come right\nback out and we'll reconvene. I'll see you in a moment.\n(Recess)\nTHE COURT: As that went in, a note came out. So I\ndon't have a response yet, but I have a note.\n\"May we please have the following testimonies in a\nbinder.\" The first one is Jane, Wong, Kate. There is\nsomething else written next to Jane.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I'm not reading the note, but\nthey got Jane. It wasn't in a binder.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Nathan",
      "Comey",
      "Sternheim",
      "Jane",
      "Wong",
      "Kate"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "December 23rd"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "771"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}