mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014700.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "14",
    "document_number": "773",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 29 LCRVMAXT 3131 1 We can't tell which flight we're talking about, which leg of a potentially multi-leg trip we're talking about. And so I think here, again, the Court gave a thorough instruction about this particular element. Because we can't tell which set of facts they are asking about, I think the proper course here is to refer the jury to the particulars with respect to this element. THE COURT: It's difficult to know and to have in my head, based on the articulation of the question, as well as the testimony, exactly what they are referring to. I don't know. So I am inclined to follow the government's suggestion here and to say, I can't provide an additional response to your question other than to consider carefully the instructions as to -- I mean, I could either point them to all of the count or specifically to the second element, since that's what they're asking about. MR. EVERDELL: If we're going to just refer them to certain language, I think we refer them to the language in the last paragraph. THE COURT: Page? MR. EVERDELL: Page 28, instruction number 21, lines 14 through 17. MS. MOE: Your Honor, those particular lines don't appear to be what the jury is asking about. I recognize that the note refers to Count Four and the second element, but the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014700",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 29 LCRVMAXT 3131",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 We can't tell which flight we're talking about, which leg of a potentially multi-leg trip we're talking about. And so I think here, again, the Court gave a thorough instruction about this particular element. Because we can't tell which set of facts they are asking about, I think the proper course here is to refer the jury to the particulars with respect to this element. THE COURT: It's difficult to know and to have in my head, based on the articulation of the question, as well as the testimony, exactly what they are referring to. I don't know. So I am inclined to follow the government's suggestion here and to say, I can't provide an additional response to your question other than to consider carefully the instructions as to -- I mean, I could either point them to all of the count or specifically to the second element, since that's what they're asking about. MR. EVERDELL: If we're going to just refer them to certain language, I think we refer them to the language in the last paragraph. THE COURT: Page? MR. EVERDELL: Page 28, instruction number 21, lines 14 through 17. MS. MOE: Your Honor, those particular lines don't appear to be what the jury is asking about. I recognize that the note refers to Count Four and the second element, but the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014700",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "773",
      "28",
      "21",
      "14",
      "17",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014700"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}