mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014708.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "22 of 29",
    "document_number": "773",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 22 of 29 3139 LCRVMAXT\n1 which is the substantive transportation count, which, as we\n2 know, has to deal with the violation of New York law. And they\n3 are talking about flights to New Mexico; and can she be found\n4 guilty on the second element of Count Four regarding these\n5 flights to New Mexico.\n6 So I think we may have to respond to the jury on that\n7 score as well, which is the fact that they have to be\n8 considering New York events for Count Four, rather than -- or\n9 violations of New York law, which wouldn't occur in New Mexico\n10 for there to be a conviction on Count Four.\n11 MS. MODE: Your Honor, I think that's exactly why we\n12 proposed directing the jurors to the entirety of the\n13 instruction, which says just that. The second paragraph of\n14 that same instruction reminds the jury, as the instruction does\n15 throughout, that we're talking about New York Penal Law,\n16 Section 130.55. And so I think our proposal remains the same\n17 that they be referred to the entirety of the instruction, which\n18 includes that language, among other aspects of this particular\n19 element.\n20 THE COURT: Yes.\n21 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may I be heard for a moment?\n22 THE COURT: Sure.\n23 MS. STERNHEIM: I think the fact that the jury has\n24 mentioned New Mexico regarding a count that pertains to New\n25 York is not just cleared up by referring them to the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014708",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 22 of 29 3139 LCRVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 which is the substantive transportation count, which, as we\n2 know, has to deal with the violation of New York law. And they\n3 are talking about flights to New Mexico; and can she be found\n4 guilty on the second element of Count Four regarding these\n5 flights to New Mexico.\n6 So I think we may have to respond to the jury on that\n7 score as well, which is the fact that they have to be\n8 considering New York events for Count Four, rather than -- or\n9 violations of New York law, which wouldn't occur in New Mexico\n10 for there to be a conviction on Count Four.\n11 MS. MODE: Your Honor, I think that's exactly why we\n12 proposed directing the jurors to the entirety of the\n13 instruction, which says just that. The second paragraph of\n14 that same instruction reminds the jury, as the instruction does\n15 throughout, that we're talking about New York Penal Law,\n16 Section 130.55. And so I think our proposal remains the same\n17 that they be referred to the entirety of the instruction, which\n18 includes that language, among other aspects of this particular\n19 element.\n20 THE COURT: Yes.\n21 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may I be heard for a moment?\n22 THE COURT: Sure.\n23 MS. STERNHEIM: I think the fact that the jury has\n24 mentioned New Mexico regarding a count that pertains to New\n25 York is not just cleared up by referring them to the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014708",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MODE",
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "773",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014708"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about a case involving flights to New Mexico and the application of New York law. The transcript includes dialogue between the court and lawyers, and references to specific counts and legal codes."
}