mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014718.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "775",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 16 3148 LCSCMAXT\n1 (Jury not present)\n2 THE COURT: I received -- I think it was filed in the wee hours, I didn't receive it until this morning, the defense's followup letter taking a slightly different approach to the jury's last note than what was argued in court.\n3 I haven't heard from the government.\n4 MS. MOE: I just noticed that the door to the jury room is open.\n5 THE COURT: Thank you. To be clear, the jury is not there.\n6 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I meant the door to the area that leads to the jury room. Just wanted to be cautious.\n7 THE COURT: Thank you. Appreciate that.\n8 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. With respect to the defendant's letter, this is essentially the same argument that the defense advanced yesterday, which the Court carefully considered and rejected. Nothing has changed between then and now.\n9 In particular, the defense's letter identifies no error in the instruction the Court referred the jury to nor could they. It was a correct legal instruction when the Court instructed the jury last week, it was a correct legal instruction when the Court referred the jury to it yesterday afternoon, and that it remains true. It was a thorough and carefully considered instruction on the legal elements and\n10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n11 DOJ-OGR-00014718",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 16 3148 LCSCMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Jury not present)\nTHE COURT: I received -- I think it was filed in the wee hours, I didn't receive it until this morning, the defense's followup letter taking a slightly different approach to the jury's last note than what was argued in court.\nI haven't heard from the government.\nMS. MOE: I just noticed that the door to the jury room is open.\nTHE COURT: Thank you. To be clear, the jury is not there.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I meant the door to the area that leads to the jury room. Just wanted to be cautious.\nTHE COURT: Thank you. Appreciate that.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. With respect to the defendant's letter, this is essentially the same argument that the defense advanced yesterday, which the Court carefully considered and rejected. Nothing has changed between then and now.\nIn particular, the defense's letter identifies no error in the instruction the Court referred the jury to nor could they. It was a correct legal instruction when the Court instructed the jury last week, it was a correct legal instruction when the Court referred the jury to it yesterday afternoon, and that it remains true. It was a thorough and carefully considered instruction on the legal elements and",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014718",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "yesterday",
      "last week"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "775",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014718"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}