DOJ-OGR-00014728.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "12",
  4. "document_number": "775",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 16 3158 LCSCMAXT\n1\nTHE COURT: I am -- yes, go ahead, Ms. Moe.\n2\nMS. MOE: We're just going to add that the government\n3\nagrees that the Court has the discretion to set a schedule for\n4\ndeliberations. Absent a hardship, I think the schedule the\n5\nCourt has proposed is entirely reasonable under the\n6\ncircumstances.\n7\nTHE COURT: Here's what I'll do. I'll do what I just\n8\nindicated today for through the week, and if we don't have a\n9\nverdict tomorrow, I'll say through the weekend.\n10\nMR. PAGLIUCA: That makes sense to me, your Honor.\n11\nTHE COURT: In each case, I am couching it with, they\n12\nhave the option to indicate if it's a hardship due to\n13\nunmoveable commitments.\n14\nMR. PAGLIUCA: That's a good suggestion, your Honor.\n15\nThat's fine with us.\n16\nTHE COURT: Ms. Moe.\n17\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.\n18\nTHE COURT: Let me tell you exactly what I plan to say\n19\nso you can tell me if you wish anything different.\n20\nFirst, I'll just go over the schedule and COVID\n21\nprotocols, which the district executive has asked me to remind,\n22\nin light of the variant. And I'll continue to urge caution as\n23\nI have been. And then I'll say, as to schedule going forward,\n24\nwe are going to continue with the same daily schedule as today,\n25\nthat is to say 9:00 a.m. to at least 6:00 p.m. Please let me\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014728",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 16 3158 LCSCMAXT",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1\nTHE COURT: I am -- yes, go ahead, Ms. Moe.\n2\nMS. MOE: We're just going to add that the government\n3\nagrees that the Court has the discretion to set a schedule for\n4\ndeliberations. Absent a hardship, I think the schedule the\n5\nCourt has proposed is entirely reasonable under the\n6\ncircumstances.\n7\nTHE COURT: Here's what I'll do. I'll do what I just\n8\nindicated today for through the week, and if we don't have a\n9\nverdict tomorrow, I'll say through the weekend.\n10\nMR. PAGLIUCA: That makes sense to me, your Honor.\n11\nTHE COURT: In each case, I am couching it with, they\n12\nhave the option to indicate if it's a hardship due to\n13\nunmoveable commitments.\n14\nMR. PAGLIUCA: That's a good suggestion, your Honor.\n15\nThat's fine with us.\n16\nTHE COURT: Ms. Moe.\n17\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.\n18\nTHE COURT: Let me tell you exactly what I plan to say\n19\nso you can tell me if you wish anything different.\n20\nFirst, I'll just go over the schedule and COVID\n21\nprotocols, which the district executive has asked me to remind,\n22\nin light of the variant. And I'll continue to urge caution as\n23\nI have been. And then I'll say, as to schedule going forward,\n24\nwe are going to continue with the same daily schedule as today,\n25\nthat is to say 9:00 a.m. to at least 6:00 p.m. Please let me",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014728",
  30. "position": "margin"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Ms. Moe",
  36. "MR. PAGLIUCA"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  40. "DOJ"
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "08/10/22"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  48. "775",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00014728"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }