DOJ-OGR-00000345.json 8.6 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "11-1",
  5. "date": "July 8, 2019",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 3 of 10\n\nHonorable Henry Pitman\nUnited States Magistrate Judge\nJuly 8, 2019\nPage 3\n\nAs has been widely reported, the defendant is extraordinarily wealthy, and he owns and maintains luxury properties and residences around the world, including in Manhattan, New York; Palm Beach, Florida; Stanely, New Mexico; and Paris, France. Additionally, Epstein owns a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands which, as noted above, is believed to be his primary residence in the United States. His mansion in Manhattan alone—a multi-story townhouse reported to be one of the largest single residences in all of Manhattan, which previously housed a school and which he owns through an LLC—has been valued at approximately $77 million. Entities controlled by the defendant also own at least two private jets in active service, at least one of which is capable of intercontinental travel.\n\nAs described further below, the defendant possesses three active United States passports, and his international connections and travels are extensive. For example, in addition to maintaining a residence in Paris, France, as described above, in the past 18 months alone, the defendant has traveled abroad, via private jet, either into or out of the country on approximately more than 20 occasions.\n\nC. The Prior Florida Investigation\n\nIn or about 2005, the defendant was investigated by local police in Palm Beach, Florida, in connection with allegations that he had committed similar sex offenses against minor girls. The investigation ultimately also involved federal authorities, namely the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (“SDFL”) and the FBI's Miami Office, and included interviews with victims based in the Palm Beach area, including some of the alleged victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment.1\n\nIn fall 2007, the defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the SDFL in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations into the defendant's abuse of minor girls in the Palm Beach area. The Southern District of New York was not a signatory to that agreement, and the defendant was never charged federally.2 In June 2008, the defendant pled guilty in state court to one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a felony, and one count of solicitation of prostitution, a felony. As a result, the defendant was designated as a sex offender with registration requirements under the national Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.\n\n1 The non-prosecution agreement, further discussed below, was entered into at the conclusion of the SDFL investigation and did not purport to cover any victims outside of the State of Florida. As noted above, the instant Indictment expressly alleges the existence of dozens of victims who were abused in this District in addition to dozens of victims who were abused in Florida.\n\n2 While beyond the scope of a bail hearing, as discussed further below, it is well-established in the Second Circuit that absent an express provision to the contrary in the agreement, one District is not bound by the terms of an agreement entered into between a defendant and a U.S. Attorney's Office in another district. See page 6, infra.\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000345",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 3 of 10",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Honorable Henry Pitman\nUnited States Magistrate Judge\nJuly 8, 2019\nPage 3",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "As has been widely reported, the defendant is extraordinarily wealthy, and he owns and maintains luxury properties and residences around the world, including in Manhattan, New York; Palm Beach, Florida; Stanely, New Mexico; and Paris, France. Additionally, Epstein owns a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands which, as noted above, is believed to be his primary residence in the United States. His mansion in Manhattan alone—a multi-story townhouse reported to be one of the largest single residences in all of Manhattan, which previously housed a school and which he owns through an LLC—has been valued at approximately $77 million. Entities controlled by the defendant also own at least two private jets in active service, at least one of which is capable of intercontinental travel.",
  25. "position": "body"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "As described further below, the defendant possesses three active United States passports, and his international connections and travels are extensive. For example, in addition to maintaining a residence in Paris, France, as described above, in the past 18 months alone, the defendant has traveled abroad, via private jet, either into or out of the country on approximately more than 20 occasions.",
  30. "position": "body"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "C. The Prior Florida Investigation",
  35. "position": "body"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "In or about 2005, the defendant was investigated by local police in Palm Beach, Florida, in connection with allegations that he had committed similar sex offenses against minor girls. The investigation ultimately also involved federal authorities, namely the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (“SDFL”) and the FBI's Miami Office, and included interviews with victims based in the Palm Beach area, including some of the alleged victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment.1",
  40. "position": "body"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "In fall 2007, the defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the SDFL in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations into the defendant's abuse of minor girls in the Palm Beach area. The Southern District of New York was not a signatory to that agreement, and the defendant was never charged federally.2 In June 2008, the defendant pled guilty in state court to one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a felony, and one count of solicitation of prostitution, a felony. As a result, the defendant was designated as a sex offender with registration requirements under the national Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.",
  45. "position": "body"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "1 The non-prosecution agreement, further discussed below, was entered into at the conclusion of the SDFL investigation and did not purport to cover any victims outside of the State of Florida. As noted above, the instant Indictment expressly alleges the existence of dozens of victims who were abused in this District in addition to dozens of victims who were abused in Florida.",
  50. "position": "footnote"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "2 While beyond the scope of a bail hearing, as discussed further below, it is well-established in the Second Circuit that absent an express provision to the contrary in the agreement, one District is not bound by the terms of an agreement entered into between a defendant and a U.S. Attorney's Office in another district. See page 6, infra.",
  55. "position": "footnote"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000345",
  60. "position": "footer"
  61. }
  62. ],
  63. "entities": {
  64. "people": [
  65. "Henry Pitman",
  66. "Epstein"
  67. ],
  68. "organizations": [
  69. "U.S. Attorney's Office",
  70. "FBI's Miami Office"
  71. ],
  72. "locations": [
  73. "Manhattan",
  74. "New York",
  75. "Palm Beach",
  76. "Florida",
  77. "Stanely",
  78. "New Mexico",
  79. "Paris",
  80. "France",
  81. "U.S. Virgin Islands",
  82. "United States",
  83. "Southern District of Florida",
  84. "Southern District of New York"
  85. ],
  86. "dates": [
  87. "July 8, 2019",
  88. "2005",
  89. "2007",
  90. "June 2008"
  91. ],
  92. "reference_numbers": [
  93. "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
  94. "11-1",
  95. "DOJ-OGR-00000345"
  96. ]
  97. },
  98. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is page 3 of a 10-page filing."
  99. }