DOJ-OGR-00002349.json 7.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2 of 23",
  4. "document_number": "134",
  5. "date": "02/04/21",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 23\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................................................................ii\nTABLE OF EXHIBITS...........................................................................................................................................iv\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT........................................................................................1\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................2\n A. The Protective Order in Giuffre v. Maxwell...............................................................................................2\n B. Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions.................................................................................................4\n C. The Settlement And Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order.....6\n D. The Government's False Statements To ....................................................................................................6\n E. Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government...................................................................10\nARGUMENT........................................................................................................................................................11\n A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence.......................................................................................................................................................11\n 1. The role of protective orders in civil litigation.......................................................................................11\n 2. The government circumvented the protective order................................................................................12\n 3. The government violated due process......................................................................................................14\n 4. This court possesses the inherent authority to order suppression.............................................................15\n B. At A Minimum, This Court Should Order A Hearing At Which Maxwell May Inquire Into The Circumstances Surrounding The Government's Misrepresentations To ...............................................................................................................................16\nCONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................16\nCertificate of Service...........................................................................................................................................18\n\nDOJ-OGR-00002349",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 23",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................................................................ii\nTABLE OF EXHIBITS...........................................................................................................................................iv\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT........................................................................................1\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................2\n A. The Protective Order in Giuffre v. Maxwell...............................................................................................2\n B. Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions.................................................................................................4\n C. The Settlement And Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order.....6\n D. The Government's False Statements To ....................................................................................................6\n E. Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government...................................................................10\nARGUMENT........................................................................................................................................................11\n A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence.......................................................................................................................................................11\n 1. The role of protective orders in civil litigation.......................................................................................11\n 2. The government circumvented the protective order................................................................................12\n 3. The government violated due process......................................................................................................14\n 4. This court possesses the inherent authority to order suppression.............................................................15\n B. At A Minimum, This Court Should Order A Hearing At Which Maxwell May Inquire Into The Circumstances Surrounding The Government's Misrepresentations To ...............................................................................................................................16\nCONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................16\nCertificate of Service...........................................................................................................................................18",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002349",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Maxwell",
  36. "Giuffre"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [],
  39. "locations": [],
  40. "dates": [
  41. "02/04/21",
  42. "April 2016",
  43. "July 2016"
  44. ],
  45. "reference_numbers": [
  46. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  47. "Document 134",
  48. "DOJ-OGR-00002349"
  49. ]
  50. },
  51. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. Some text is redacted, likely for privacy or sensitivity reasons. The document is a table of contents for a larger legal brief or argument."
  52. }