| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "18",
- "document_number": "459",
- "date": "11/15/21",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 18 of 43 18 LalWmaxC no doubt about that. I think what we're talking about is a fairly limited process that requires, of course, checking in the individuals. But we'll lose a little bit of time, to be sure. Is that the government's view and the basis for that view. MS. POMERANTZ: Yes. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. The defense would request that challenges be exercised on the 29th for the following reason: There is at least a ten-day gap from the last scheduled day of jury selection until the start of the trial on the 29th. Significantly, prospective jurors will be celebrating Thanksgiving, a holiday that most have not celebrated in more than a year. It is likely that the topic of jury service and this case may come up. Views may be espoused, especially if people know that a family member or friend has been summoned to jury service, and it is very unlikely and very uncomfortable for a prospective juror to have to remove themselves from the Thanksgiving table or the venue to avoid being involved in that conversation. I would say that in an abundance of caution, that the better approach would be to do it on the 29th. It will not SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00006990",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 18 of 43 18",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LalWmaxC no doubt about that. I think what we're talking about is a fairly limited process that requires, of course, checking in the individuals. But we'll lose a little bit of time, to be sure. Is that the government's view and the basis for that view. MS. POMERANTZ: Yes. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. The defense would request that challenges be exercised on the 29th for the following reason: There is at least a ten-day gap from the last scheduled day of jury selection until the start of the trial on the 29th. Significantly, prospective jurors will be celebrating Thanksgiving, a holiday that most have not celebrated in more than a year. It is likely that the topic of jury service and this case may come up. Views may be espoused, especially if people know that a family member or friend has been summoned to jury service, and it is very unlikely and very uncomfortable for a prospective juror to have to remove themselves from the Thanksgiving table or the venue to avoid being involved in that conversation. I would say that in an abundance of caution, that the better approach would be to do it on the 29th. It will not",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006990",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MS. POMERANTZ",
- "MS. STERNHEIM"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "11/15/21",
- "29th"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "Document 459",
- "DOJ-OGR-00006990"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|