DOJ-OGR-00006990.json 3.6 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "18",
  4. "document_number": "459",
  5. "date": "11/15/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 18 of 43 18 LalWmaxC no doubt about that. I think what we're talking about is a fairly limited process that requires, of course, checking in the individuals. But we'll lose a little bit of time, to be sure. Is that the government's view and the basis for that view. MS. POMERANTZ: Yes. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. The defense would request that challenges be exercised on the 29th for the following reason: There is at least a ten-day gap from the last scheduled day of jury selection until the start of the trial on the 29th. Significantly, prospective jurors will be celebrating Thanksgiving, a holiday that most have not celebrated in more than a year. It is likely that the topic of jury service and this case may come up. Views may be espoused, especially if people know that a family member or friend has been summoned to jury service, and it is very unlikely and very uncomfortable for a prospective juror to have to remove themselves from the Thanksgiving table or the venue to avoid being involved in that conversation. I would say that in an abundance of caution, that the better approach would be to do it on the 29th. It will not SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00006990",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 18 of 43 18",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LalWmaxC no doubt about that. I think what we're talking about is a fairly limited process that requires, of course, checking in the individuals. But we'll lose a little bit of time, to be sure. Is that the government's view and the basis for that view. MS. POMERANTZ: Yes. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. The defense would request that challenges be exercised on the 29th for the following reason: There is at least a ten-day gap from the last scheduled day of jury selection until the start of the trial on the 29th. Significantly, prospective jurors will be celebrating Thanksgiving, a holiday that most have not celebrated in more than a year. It is likely that the topic of jury service and this case may come up. Views may be espoused, especially if people know that a family member or friend has been summoned to jury service, and it is very unlikely and very uncomfortable for a prospective juror to have to remove themselves from the Thanksgiving table or the venue to avoid being involved in that conversation. I would say that in an abundance of caution, that the better approach would be to do it on the 29th. It will not",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006990",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. POMERANTZ",
  36. "MS. STERNHEIM"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  40. ],
  41. "locations": [],
  42. "dates": [
  43. "11/15/21",
  44. "29th"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  48. "Document 459",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00006990"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }