DOJ-OGR-00019403.json 6.3 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "4",
  4. "document_number": "60",
  5. "date": "09/24/2020",
  6. "document_type": "Table of Authorities",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page4 of 58\n\nTable of Authorities\n\nCases\n\nBond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 2009)...............................................20\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................4, 5, 10, 12\nCohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)...............................10\nFlanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984)...............................................12, 13, 14\nIn re City of N.Y., 607 F.3d 923 (2d Cir. 2010)..................................................20\nIn re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y., 745 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2014)................21\nIn re Telligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)..................................................3\nKoon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996)........................................................26\nLouis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2012) ..............28, 30\nMartindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) ..............................................................................passim\nMidland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794 (1989)..................................12\nMinpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1987) ................10\nPichler v. UNITE, 585 F.3d 741 (3d Cir. 2009)....................................................10\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993) ...10\nSEC v. Boock, No. 09 Civ. 8261(DLC), 2010 WL 2398918 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2010)...............................................................................30\nTrs. of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat'l Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D.N.Y.1995)......................................................28\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986)...........................................15, 16\niii\nDOJ-OGR-00019403",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page4 of 58",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Table of Authorities",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Cases",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Bond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 2009)...............................................20\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................4, 5, 10, 12\nCohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)...............................10\nFlanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984)...............................................12, 13, 14\nIn re City of N.Y., 607 F.3d 923 (2d Cir. 2010)..................................................20\nIn re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y., 745 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2014)................21\nIn re Telligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)..................................................3\nKoon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996)........................................................26\nLouis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2012) ..............28, 30\nMartindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) ..............................................................................passim\nMidland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794 (1989)..................................12\nMinpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1987) ................10\nPichler v. UNITE, 585 F.3d 741 (3d Cir. 2009)....................................................10\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993) ...10\nSEC v. Boock, No. 09 Civ. 8261(DLC), 2010 WL 2398918 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2010)...............................................................................30\nTrs. of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat'l Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D.N.Y.1995)......................................................28\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986)...........................................15, 16",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "iii",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019403",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "Utreras",
  47. "Maxwell",
  48. "Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.",
  49. "United States",
  50. "City of N.Y.",
  51. "Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y.",
  52. "Telligent, Inc.",
  53. "Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.",
  54. "LY USA, Inc.",
  55. "International Telephone and Telegraph Corp.",
  56. "Midland Asphalt Corp.",
  57. "Minpeco S.A.",
  58. "Conticommodity Servs., Inc.",
  59. "UNITE",
  60. "Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth.",
  61. "Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.",
  62. "SEC",
  63. "Boock",
  64. "Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat'l Pension Fund",
  65. "Transworld Mech., Inc.",
  66. "Caparros"
  67. ],
  68. "locations": [
  69. "N.Y.",
  70. "S.D.N.Y.",
  71. "Albany"
  72. ],
  73. "dates": [
  74. "09/24/2020",
  75. "2009",
  76. "2019",
  77. "1949",
  78. "1984",
  79. "2010",
  80. "2014",
  81. "2011",
  82. "1996",
  83. "2012",
  84. "1979",
  85. "1989",
  86. "1987",
  87. "1993",
  88. "June 15, 2010",
  89. "1995",
  90. "1986"
  91. ],
  92. "reference_numbers": [
  93. "20-3061",
  94. "60",
  95. "2938278",
  96. "4",
  97. "585 F.3d 1061",
  98. "929 F.3d 41",
  99. "337 U.S. 541",
  100. "465 U.S. 259",
  101. "607 F.3d 923",
  102. "745 F.3d 30",
  103. "640 F.3d 53",
  104. "518 U.S. 81",
  105. "676 F.3d 83",
  106. "594 F.2d 291",
  107. "489 U.S. 794",
  108. "832 F.2d 739",
  109. "585 F.3d 741",
  110. "506 U.S. 139",
  111. "09 Civ. 8261(DLC)",
  112. "886 F. Supp. 1134",
  113. "800 F.2d 23",
  114. "DOJ-OGR-00019403"
  115. ]
  116. },
  117. "additional_notes": "The document is a table of authorities from a legal case. It appears to be a printed document with no handwritten text or stamps. The text is clear and legible."
  118. }