| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "15",
- "document_number": "745",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 264 421 LC1VMAX1\n1 MS. MENNINGER: It's a type-up of the agent's notes.\n2 We also have the agent's handwritten notes.\n3 The next sentence -- then I'll explain what I think we\n4 may get to. The next sentence, she says, That home was a\n5 three-bedroom home in a gated community called Bear Lake,\n6 something like that. Those were the two statements that were\n7 typed up in the agent's 302.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MENNINGER: And in the handwritten notes.\n10 She's had a chance to explain it; in her mind, it's a\n11 typo. We have those agents on call to be witnesses, and they\n12 can talk about whether it was a typo or not a typo. I mean, I\n13 think that's the state of play in terms of contradicting a\n14 witness with a prior inconsistent statement.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Do we have issues to take up around\n19 specific identifying information?\n20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n21 Just to provide the Court with an update on the status\n22 of our conferral with defense counsel, defense counsel provided\n23 the government with a list of certain topics this morning,\n24 which we appreciated; and we had a productive conversation this\n25 morning about a number of those topics, and I think I've\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012035",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 264 421 LC1VMAX1",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: It's a type-up of the agent's notes.\n2 We also have the agent's handwritten notes.\n3 The next sentence -- then I'll explain what I think we\n4 may get to. The next sentence, she says, That home was a\n5 three-bedroom home in a gated community called Bear Lake,\n6 something like that. Those were the two statements that were\n7 typed up in the agent's 302.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MENNINGER: And in the handwritten notes.\n10 She's had a chance to explain it; in her mind, it's a\n11 typo. We have those agents on call to be witnesses, and they\n12 can talk about whether it was a typo or not a typo. I mean, I\n13 think that's the state of play in terms of contradicting a\n14 witness with a prior inconsistent statement.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Do we have issues to take up around\n19 specific identifying information?\n20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n21 Just to provide the Court with an update on the status\n22 of our conferral with defense counsel, defense counsel provided\n23 the government with a list of certain topics this morning,\n24 which we appreciated; and we had a productive conversation this\n25 morning about a number of those topics, and I think I've",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012035",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MS. MENNINGER",
- "THE COURT",
- "MR. ROHRBACH",
- "MR. EVERDELL",
- "MS. MOE"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Bear Lake"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "745",
- "DOJ-OGR-00012035"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
- }
|