DOJ-OGR-00012035.json 4.0 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "15",
  4. "document_number": "745",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 264 421 LC1VMAX1\n1 MS. MENNINGER: It's a type-up of the agent's notes.\n2 We also have the agent's handwritten notes.\n3 The next sentence -- then I'll explain what I think we\n4 may get to. The next sentence, she says, That home was a\n5 three-bedroom home in a gated community called Bear Lake,\n6 something like that. Those were the two statements that were\n7 typed up in the agent's 302.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MENNINGER: And in the handwritten notes.\n10 She's had a chance to explain it; in her mind, it's a\n11 typo. We have those agents on call to be witnesses, and they\n12 can talk about whether it was a typo or not a typo. I mean, I\n13 think that's the state of play in terms of contradicting a\n14 witness with a prior inconsistent statement.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Do we have issues to take up around\n19 specific identifying information?\n20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n21 Just to provide the Court with an update on the status\n22 of our conferral with defense counsel, defense counsel provided\n23 the government with a list of certain topics this morning,\n24 which we appreciated; and we had a productive conversation this\n25 morning about a number of those topics, and I think I've\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012035",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 264 421 LC1VMAX1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: It's a type-up of the agent's notes.\n2 We also have the agent's handwritten notes.\n3 The next sentence -- then I'll explain what I think we\n4 may get to. The next sentence, she says, That home was a\n5 three-bedroom home in a gated community called Bear Lake,\n6 something like that. Those were the two statements that were\n7 typed up in the agent's 302.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MENNINGER: And in the handwritten notes.\n10 She's had a chance to explain it; in her mind, it's a\n11 typo. We have those agents on call to be witnesses, and they\n12 can talk about whether it was a typo or not a typo. I mean, I\n13 think that's the state of play in terms of contradicting a\n14 witness with a prior inconsistent statement.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Do we have issues to take up around\n19 specific identifying information?\n20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n21 Just to provide the Court with an update on the status\n22 of our conferral with defense counsel, defense counsel provided\n23 the government with a list of certain topics this morning,\n24 which we appreciated; and we had a productive conversation this\n25 morning about a number of those topics, and I think I've",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012035",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. MENNINGER",
  36. "THE COURT",
  37. "MR. ROHRBACH",
  38. "MR. EVERDELL",
  39. "MS. MOE"
  40. ],
  41. "organizations": [
  42. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  43. ],
  44. "locations": [
  45. "Bear Lake"
  46. ],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "08/10/22"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "745",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00012035"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
  57. }