| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "238",
- "document_number": "745",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 264 649 LC1VMAX7 Matt - direct frustration about that. That is entirely consistent with her testimony that she was, in fact, abused. MS. STERNHEIM: But not with regard to her mother having a confrontation. THE COURT: Well, it's a prior consistent statement that he heard related to the abuse which you've repeatedly called into question in your opening and your direct and in your cross-examination. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I understand that. But we're talking about prior consistent statements. THE COURT: Right. The prior consistent statement is that she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. MS. STERNHEIM: But they are bringing out a conversation. If she wants to say, Did you know or learn that she was abused? Yes. But a conversation that she had with her mother is hearsay. MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not hearsay because it's a prior consistent statement of Jane about her experiencing sexual abuse. THE COURT: Yes. Overruled. (Continued on next page) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012258",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 264 649",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LC1VMAX7 Matt - direct",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "frustration about that. That is entirely consistent with her testimony that she was, in fact, abused. MS. STERNHEIM: But not with regard to her mother having a confrontation. THE COURT: Well, it's a prior consistent statement that he heard related to the abuse which you've repeatedly called into question in your opening and your direct and in your cross-examination. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I understand that. But we're talking about prior consistent statements. THE COURT: Right. The prior consistent statement is that she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. MS. STERNHEIM: But they are bringing out a conversation. If she wants to say, Did you know or learn that she was abused? Yes. But a conversation that she had with her mother is hearsay. MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not hearsay because it's a prior consistent statement of Jane about her experiencing sexual abuse. THE COURT: Yes. Overruled. (Continued on next page)",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012258",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Jeffrey Epstein",
- "Jane",
- "MS. STERNHEIM",
- "MS. MOE"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "745",
- "DOJ-OGR-00012258"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|